People have a tendency to assume that anything said by figures of authority must automatically be correct, at least when they are talking about their own fields. This, on its face, seems to be a logical assumption. After all, an expert has studied his field far more thoroughly than a layman, and with his greater knowledge he should be more capable of drawing conclusions.
Posted by picard578 on September 21, 2015
This article will compare NATO tanks according to characteristics actually required of battle tanks. These are likely to be different from typical focus on armor and firepower above all else. Consequently, first thing that has to be established is actual usage of tanks; all necessary characteristics stem from that.
“The tank’s purpose is to bring machine-guns to bear on the enemy’s unprotected rear, using speed and surprise.”
– General George S. Patton
“Logistics is the ball and chain of armored warfare.”
– Heinz Guderian
George Patton also wrote that it would have been impossible for him to achieve the successes of the Third army if he had been forced to use German tanks. He was entirely correct, as will be seen from the following. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in weapons | Tagged: Abrams, AMX-56, AMX-56 Leclerc, Ariete, Ariete vs M-84D, Ariete vs M1 Abrams, Challenger 2, Challenger 2 Streetfighter, Challenger 2 vs Ariete, Challenger 2 vs Leclerc, Challenger 2 vs Leopard 2, Challenger 2 vs M-84D, Challenger 2 vs M1 Abrams, Greek tank evaluation, Leclerc, Leclerc vs Ariete, Leclerc vs M-84D, Leclerc vs M1 Abrams, Leopard 2, Leopard 2 vs Ariete, Leopard 2 vs Leclerc, Leopard 2 vs M-84D, Leopard 2 vs M1 Abrams, M-84, M-84D, M-84D vs M1 Abrams, M1 Abrams, M1A2, M1A2SEP, main battle tank comparison, NATO main battle tanks, NATO main battle tanks comparison, NATO tank comparison, tank comparison, tank evaluation, vs, Western main battle tanks, Western tank comparison | 64 Comments »
Posted by picard578 on September 11, 2015
This article will compare Rafale C and F-35A. Both aircraft have similar, almost identical purposes: they are to replace most other fixed wing aircraft types in use by their respective air forces. Both have land-based and carrier versions. But there are major differences in actual approach, and in the final product. While Rafale’s maneuverability is undisputed, it is often-ignored fact is that F-35 was advertised as a highly-maneuverable dogfighter, before its obvious inability to actually achieve high maneuverability forced Lockheed Martin to change rhetorics. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in weapons | Tagged: Dassault Rafale, Dassault Rafale vs F-35, Dassault Rafale vs F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, Dassault Rafale vs F-35 Lightning II, F-35, F-35 Lightning II, rafale vs f-35, Rafale vs JSF, Rafale vs Lightning II, vs | 44 Comments »
Posted by picard578 on September 1, 2015
This article will compare a theoretical FLX concept with the F-35 JSF. Hence, it is more than just a comparison of different aircraft. Rather, it is a comparison of results of two different approaches. FLX is a thoroughbred air-superiority fighter, while the F-35 is a jack-of-all-trades (supposed to be; its design imperatives were in-theatre strike and battlefield interdiction). FLX uses an integrated design approach where each piece of technology used has very clear purpose within FLXs operational concept, while the F-35 is an exercise in cramming every possible piece of “high technology” into one airframe. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted by picard578 on August 16, 2015
Originally posted on Patrice Ayme's Thoughts:
Islam contains an ideological rape kit. Sacred texts of Islam clearly state that “those that your right hand possess” (that is, slaves) can be sexually exploited. Slaves are obtained in battle. Devout Muslims are enjoined to practice as the Qur’an enjoins to do. The New York Times, in an harrowing description of systematic raping of children by Muslim warriors, is finally waking up to these facts. See:
Qur’an (33:50) – “O Prophet! We have made lawful to thee thy wives to whom thou hast paid their dowers; and those (slaves) whom thy right hand possesses out of the prisoners of war whom Allah has assigned to thee”
This is one of several verses “from Allah” which say that the limit of four wives to have sex with does NOT apply to slaves:
View original 1,099 more words
Posted by picard578 on August 16, 2015
A-10 is the premiere close air support fighter today, and one of the very few dedicated CAS platforms in existence. Close air support is one of the most important, and most difficult, missions that air force can be tasked with. However, it is part of a spectrum of missions which require cooperation with other services (army cooperation missions are close air support, armed reconnaissance, battlefield interdiction and tactical reconnaissance; navy cooperation missions are patrol surveillance, air defense and anti-ship attack; missions controlled by the air force are air-to-air, deep interdiction and strategic bombing). As such, close support is typically ignored by air forces in favor of missions that air forces control and undertake by themselves, without any involvement from other services.
Close air support is defined as attack against targets within combat (artillery) range, in direct combat contact with supported units. It has to be coordinated with both the artillery and supported units. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: A-10, A-10 vs F-35, air support, capability, Close Air Support, combat air support, effectiveness, ground attack, lethality, performance, survivability, Thunderbolt II, usefulness, versatility, Warthog, Warthog vs Lightning II | 145 Comments »
Posted by picard578 on August 1, 2015
Radar stealth does not work very well against airborne threats for three very simple reasons. First, visual identification is necessary before engagement, which requires fighters to close in to either eyeball or optical sensor range. This means that larger fighter is at disadvantage, and stealth fighters are always larger than comparable non-stealth fighters. Second, pilots will always try to approach enemy or unknow fighter from the rear to maximize time avaliable for identification and minimize possibility of being detected. This requires higher cruise speed than the target, but also that fighter remains silent during the entire intercept. While fighter performing intercept might benefit from greater situational awareness, using onboard radar warns everyone in vicinity and significantly reduces a possibility of successful attack by either intercepting fighter itself or by any friendly fighters – even those not using the radar. Third, stealth assumes that aircraft will use radars but nobody will have competent RWRs. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted by picard578 on July 24, 2015
USAF has decided not to sell the A-10 to its allies.
Why this decision? Because selling the A-10 would run contrary to everything USAF was and is saying. USAF has for years, and against all evidence, maintained that the A-10 is unsurvivable and that fast jets can and will do its job – close air support – just as well if not better. Further, selling the A-10 would reduce – however slightly – prospects for F-35 sales. F-35 is primarily a ground attack aircraft, while A-10 does nothing but ground attack, and thus two are competitors. A-10 can also be easily maintained by countries they get sold to, which means no profits for Lockheed Martin and co. from lucrative maintenance contracts.
As it stands, greed and low selfishness will kill the A-10. USAF has no interest in close air support, and it seems that it will finally manage to get rid of the mission alltogether.
Posted by picard578 on July 21, 2015
Note: full text of Qur’an is here:
Citations are from pdf pages as follows:
2:191 = pg 42
Chapter 9, verse 5 = pg 216
Originally posted on Patrice Ayme's Thoughts:
Religions pull people together again. It could be the religion of the Republic, as under the Romans. In this case the religion served the Public.
Superstitious religions are much more frequent: they serve madness, by obliging “believers” to believe the unbelievable, thus to suspend reason, and fascistically follow those who are with god(s).
Human beings are one with reason. Suspending reason is suspending themselves. It can only be achieved violently, explicitly or not. That’s why millions, even tenths of millions, were killed in the name of Christianism and Islam.
Indeed, oligarchies and plutocracies are more frequent than republics, the history of civilization shows. A republic is much harder to achieve. Calling on the fascist instinct to obey those with access to weapons, and the training and mentality to use them, is much easier.
Sometimes, there are spectacular variants to superstitious, fascist religions. The Aztecs lived at high altitude…
View original 660 more words
Posted by picard578 on July 16, 2015
CLAIM: F-35 can supercruise
Incorrect. F-35 can achieve and maintain speeds just above M 1 though usage of minimum afterburner. “Supercruise” claim can be discounted by comparing the F-35A with F-16A.
F-16A has a 40* wing sweep with a laminary wing profile designed for supersonic flight. Its engine has a frontal area of 6.082 cm2 while providing 64,9 kN dry (uninstalled) thrust, giving 10,67 N/cm2. F-16A also has wing loading of 338,5 kg/m2 at combat weight, span loading of 947,2 kg/m and TWR of 0,7 at combat weight and dry thrust.
F-35A has a 33* wing sweep with a supercritical wing profile designed for transonic flight. It also has frontal area about as large as the F-18s. Its engine has a frontal area of 10.715 cm2 while providing 124,5 kN dry thrust, giving 11,62 N/cm2. F-35A has wing loading of 427,9 kg/m2 at combat weight, span loading of 1.698 kg/m and TWR of 0,7 at combat weight and dry thrust. Read the rest of this entry »